Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/wireshark/wireshark.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/wireshark/wireshark-0.99.1-0.pre1.src.rpm Description: Was bug #194594 ethereal replacement
Just a reminder, Devel freeze for FC6Test1 is this Wed. This package will have to be ready by then for inclusion into Test1.
Question: - In Summary, why are we listing "Red Hat Desktop" integration? Surely we aren't talking about the Desktop product we sell? Is this not GENERIC gnome frontend? Why can't we just say 'Gnome integration' ? Think of the trademark problems. Needswork: - Missing BuildRequires on desktop-file-utils, automake, libtool rpmlint output: E: wireshark invalid-version 0.99.1pre1 W: wireshark incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.99.1pre1-1 0.99.1pre1-1.2 W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/wireshark W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/wireshark E: wireshark zero-length /usr/sbin/idl2wrs E: wireshark script-without-shellbang /usr/sbin/idl2wrs W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwiretap.so W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwireshark.so W: wireshark symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tethereal /usr/sbin/tshark W: wireshark doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/wireshark-0.99.1pre1/doc/dfilter2pod.pl /usr/bin/perl
I'm still not comfortable with this: %package gnome Summary: Red Hat desktop integration for wireshark and wireshark-usermode Can you change it to %package gnome Summary: Gnome desktop integration for wireshark and wireshark-usermode ? Other than that it looks good.
I've reopened this bug due to the disk failure we had. The comment has been change, I hope the package is fine now. I really want to see it in FC6test1 ..
*** Bug 194577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Approved. Added wireshark to dist-fc6, blocked ethereal. Updateding comps (if necessary)
*** Bug 226541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***