Bug 7345 - When updated to version initscripts-4.68-1.i386.rpm - pppd not works
When updated to version initscripts-4.68-1.i386.rpm - pppd not works
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 7319
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: initscripts (Show other bugs)
6.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
:
: 7355 7365 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-11-26 06:02 EST by atanas
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:11 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-11-30 15:31:46 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description atanas 1999-11-26 06:02:07 EST
Description: I have upgraded from Red Hat 5.2 to 6.1. After that ppp
connection still worked until i updated all available packages using Update
Agent several times. After last update ppp stopped to work:
I worked to isolate the problem to single package and it is:

initscripts-4.68-1.i386.rpm

I installed the prev. version - initscripts-4.63-1.i386.rpm - and after
rebooting the system ppp worked properly.

I installed back latest version - initscripts-4.68-1.i386.rpm - and ppp das
not want to work at all. When starting ppp directly by

/usr/sbin/pppd

response is:

[root@localhost atanas]# /usr/sbin/pppd
/usr/sbin/pppd: The remote system is required to authenticate itself but I
/usr/sbin/pppd: couldn't find any suitable secret (password) for it to use
to do so.
Comment 1 Koby Kahane 1999-11-26 13:19:59 EST
I have the same problem with the new initscripts, except my
system is a clean 6.1 install rather than an upgrade.
Comment 2 Michael McConnell 1999-11-28 18:23:59 EST
Workaround for this which did it for me:

Add 'noauth' to your /etc/ppp/options file.
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-29 11:17:59 EST
*** Bug 7355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ****** Bug 7365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-30 15:31:59 EST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7319 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.