Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 91958

Summary:	RFE: GNU aspell-nl version instead of the current one
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	Peter van Egdom <p.van.egdom>
Component:	aspell-nl	Assignee:	Eido Inoue <havill>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	0.50-3	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	100644

Description Peter van Egdom 2003-05-30 11:00:51 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030509

Description of problem:
The Dutch aspell dictionary as distributed by Red Hat appears not to be the same
as the one that is available on the GNU aspell dictionary list site :

"http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/"


The maintainer of the GNU version of the aspell dictionary has the following to
say about this particular version :

("http://tinf2.vub.ac.be/~dvermeir/software/dv/nl-aspell/index.html")


"The word list has been compiled from a number of sources:

 1. The list used in the aspell-nl-0.1.rpm package. The main reason
    I decided to build the present package is that I could not find
    a tarball distribution of this rpm and that some ``exceptions''
    from the official lists seemed to be missing.

 2. The lists in the official announcement (1996) about spelling
    changes.

 3. The list by Piet Tutelaers available on
    http://www.ntg.nl/spell-nl-v5b/.
"

Would it be a good idea to use the GNU version of aspell-nl instead?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
aspell-nl-0.1-17

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. - Checkout Red Hat Linux 9 or current (30 may 2003) Rawhide.

2. - Checkout GNU Aspell Dictionaries
     (http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/)
  

Actual Results:
1. - See that "aspell-nl-0.1-17" is in Red Hat.

2. - See that "aspell-nl-0.50-2.tar.bz2" exists.

Expected Results:
  Maybe Red Hat should sync with GNU Aspell Dictionaries?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eido Inoue 2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC

updated to 0.50 series with the aspell upgrade