Bug 987717 - Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - A wrapper for AT&T's Graphviz
Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - A wrapper for AT&T's Graphviz
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 979653 979654 979656 979657 979660 979666 979668 1122050
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-07-24 01:20 UTC by Christopher Meng
Modified: 2018-06-18 06:58 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-18 06:58:00 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1592136 None None None Never

Internal Links: 1592136

Description Christopher Meng 2013-07-24 01:20:55 UTC
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/perl-GraphViz2.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/perl-GraphViz2-2.14-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: This module provides a Perl interface to the amazing Graphviz, an open source 
graph visualization tool from AT&T.
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

Comment 1 Peter Oliver 2013-10-02 22:22:44 UTC
There's a newer upstream version of this module, 2.22, and version 2.14 is no-longer on CPAN proper.  Worth setting Source0 to "http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSAVAGE/GraphViz2-%{version}.tgz"?

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2013-11-04 09:02:07 UTC
(In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #1)
> There's a newer upstream version of this module, 2.22, and version 2.14 is
> no-longer on CPAN proper.  Worth setting Source0 to
> "http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSAVAGE/GraphViz2-%{version}.tgz"?

Sorry for the late response, just saw it from SPAM...

Don't worry ;) I will update the URLs once all deps are resolved.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2014-02-25 13:28:39 UTC
Besides the spec file is not for current upstream version 2.27, it does not require /usr/bin/dot (graphviz), although the run() method executes it.

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2014-02-25 13:30:57 UTC
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> Besides the spec file is not for current upstream version 2.27, it does not
> require /usr/bin/dot (graphviz), although the run() method executes it.

Cleanup soon, will finish it.

Comment 5 Lubomir Rintel 2014-04-28 12:54:00 UTC
What's the status of this? How is this different from perl-GraphViz (you my want to clarify that in %description).

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-04-28 15:19:57 UTC
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #5)
> What's the status of this? How is this different from perl-GraphViz (you my
> want to clarify that in %description).

Good catch.

perl-G and perl-G2 are from the same author. perl-G is deprecated now:

http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/

You can take a deep look:

"Interface to AT&T's GraphViz. Deprecated. See GraphViz2"

That's why I packaged perl-G2. Last year I was trying to package many dependencies, then back to G2 itself I couldn't find any free time.

I will clean up my old reviews soon.

Comment 7 Christopher Meng 2014-07-13 04:31:21 UTC
New deps again.

perl(DBIx::Admin::TableInfo) with perl(Moo) + perl(Data::Dumper::Concise).

Comment 8 Christopher Meng 2014-07-13 04:43:05 UTC
Adding Upstream releases monitoring entries, with Blocks soon.

perl(Moo) and perl(Data::Dumper::Concise) are dated in the repo.

Comment 9 Petr Pisar 2014-07-22 07:53:02 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #0)
> Spec URL: http://cicku.me/perl-GraphViz2.spec

404 Not Found

Comment 10 Petr Pisar 2014-07-22 14:47:21 UTC
I submitted DBIx::Admin::TableInfo for review as bug #1122050.

Comment 11 Emmanuel Seyman 2018-06-17 17:09:51 UTC
Okay, folks.

I now need perl-Graphviz2 in Fedora (it's in the dependency chain of perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer). Given that the spec file is no longer available and that last comment on this bug is nearly 4 years old, I've decided to treat this review as abandoned.

I've opened bug #1592136 with my attempt at a package.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.