Bug 163299
Summary: | Allow specification of additional packages to install during upgrade | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | a1tmblwd, bastian_knight, frankly3d, nadavkav |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-09 20:09:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Orion Poplawski
2005-07-14 21:59:07 UTC
Still would be nice. Moving to devel so it hopefully tracks... *** Bug 248933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** triaged *** Bug 399401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Allowing this very quickly becomes rather complicated, though. The natural thing to do here is to just provide the package selection interface. Once you've done that, the problem then becomes that you might as well also provide package removal as well as package installation. That then leads us into needing to handle both those operations in the transaction, doing all the counter-intuitive things of pulling back in packages that you explicitly unchecked, etc. *** Bug 596225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 619140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |