Bug 252268 (NOMOREXFS)

Summary: Drop chkfontpath dependencies
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: baron, dcantrell, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-08 16:47:03 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 251017, 251026, 251451, 252269, 252271, 252272, 252273, 252274, 252275, 252276, 252277, 252279, 252280, 252282    
Bug Blocks: 235704    

Description Matthias Clasen 2007-08-14 21:13:13 EDT
This is a tracker bug for http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS
Comment 1 Adam Jackson 2007-10-08 16:47:03 EDT
All bugs closed, and repoquery says no further packages depend on chkfontpath,
so this one's done.
Comment 2 jonathan baron 2008-05-03 06:33:28 EDT
I'm trying to use xemacs with the bitstream vera fonts, as I have done for many
years.  I've installed the fonts, and they are available to Firefox, but not to
xfontsel and (hence, I think) not to xemacs.  I used to use chkfontpath, but
that is gone.  I've read that I'm supposed to drag fonts to a font folder,
possibly through Nautilus, but I cannot find that folder.  It is not available
through System/Preferences/Look and feel/Appearance/Fonts.

This is Fedora 9 pre-release (rawhide).  Possibly this is a documentation
problem, but it is also possible that it has just become impossible.
Comment 3 jonathan baron 2008-05-03 13:32:13 EDT
I got xemacs working, apparently by installing xfs, going into
making a soft link
ln -s /usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera bitstream-vera
then starting xfs
service xfs start
service xfs reload
(last probably not necessary)
chkconfig xfs on
(to make sure it happens next time)

So I guess we don't need chkconfig, but perhaps xfs should
be part of the default distribution?  Or documented?