Bug 521510
Summary: | Wrong stacktrace attached. Was: [abrt] crash detected in nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-8.fc12 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mads Kiilerich <mads> | ||||||||||
Component: | abrt | Assignee: | Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc> | ||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||||||
Version: | 12 | CC: | caillon, dfediuck, dvlasenk, jmoskovc, mcepl, mcepl, mclasen, mnowak, npajkovs, robxu9, rvokal, stransky, tomek, wtogami | ||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:0b936a1a10ac8bb32d068ff1bbe4d10784e41971 | ||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2010-02-08 15:59:44 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Mads Kiilerich
2009-09-06 15:46:22 UTC
Created attachment 359921 [details]
File: backtrace
Hm, it looks like a crash somewhere in GTK...not the flash one. Nope. This is a crash in gconf-editor. Since the stacktrace has no relation to the description in the bug, I am going to close this. Or wait. I'll actually move it to abrt, so we can fix the problem of bugs with unrelated stacktraces... Right. I don't know how that happened. That stacktrace belongs on bug 521507 where it was filed. nsnpluginwrapper crash was in /var/cache/abrt/ccpp-1252197179-13854 gconf-editor crash was in /var/cache/abrt/ccpp-1252250554-1742 I think I had abrt-0.0.8.5-1.fc12.i686 installed at that time. Created attachment 360363 [details]
/var/cache/abrt/ccpp-1252197179-13854/backtrace from nspluginwrapper
This issues has been reassigned and moved around, but just in case anybody cares I have attached the nspluginwrapper stacktrace which should have been attached in the first place.
Hi, it seems that abrtdb is messed up, could you please send me the whole /var/cache/abrt/ dir? Thank you, Jirka Ok, please run abrt in the debug mode $ abrtd -dvvv and try to report this bug again. Then copy and paste the output. Thanks. abrt-gui just tells me that it has been submitted here and does not allow me to report it again. How can I make it forget that report? Another question. I suppose that you have also Logger reporter enabled. So take a look into file /var/log/abrt and try to find this report (search for uuid [see whiteboard]). Is it also corrupted? If not, that the bug isn't in abrt itself but in bz plugin. Thanks. (In reply to comment #8) > abrt-gui just tells me that it has been submitted here and does not allow me to > report it again. How can I make it forget that report? It isn't important. The thing is, that if you run a deamon in a debug mode, then it prints a lot of information even if the crash is already reported. So, stop the daemon $service abrt stop, and run it in the debug mode from command line $abrt -dvvv. Thanks. *** Bug 524082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 361556 [details]
abrtd -dvvv when filing 524082
abrt-0.0.8.5-1.fc12.i686
Created attachment 361557 [details]
/var/log/abrt-logger
My /var/log/abrt-logger - I don't know if this makes sense to you
*** Bug 523191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 522967 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 522982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 523328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I haven't seen this for a while, so I guess this issue has been fixed? This has been fixed a while ago. |