Bug 90914

Summary: Error messages after kernel upgrade (2.4.20-13.7)
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Gilles CHAUVIN <gilles.chauvin>
Component: quotaAssignee: Steve Dickson <steved>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.3CC: ckippe, herrold, krustev, thoron
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-06-06 17:29:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 53718, 68274    
Bug Blocks: 90939, 90985, 91048, 91159, 91250, 91432, 91897, 92061    

Description Gilles CHAUVIN 2003-05-15 10:12:57 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314

Description of problem:
Some quotas program related error messages are appearing while starting /
stopping the server since the system was upgraded to kernel-2.4.20-13.7 ( See
RHSA-2002:206 @ https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-206.html ).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
quota-3.03-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade to latest available kernel (2.4.20-13.7)
2. Reboot the server
3. Some error messages does appear concerning quotas
    

Additional info:

I took the quota-3.06-9.src.rpm file present in the RawHide repository and did a
--rebuild of the package against RedHat7.3.

I don't have any error messages anymore...

Proposed fix: Provide an updated version of the "quota" program in the updates
repository.

Comment 1 Delian Krustev 2003-05-23 18:21:31 UTC
The new kernel is compiled with quota v.2 only. The quota package in rh 7.3
seems to require support for v.1. The platform should be changed to all. rh 7.2
also seems to be concerned.

Comment 2 Petri T. Koistinen 2003-06-01 09:18:51 UTC
I think severity should be on security level.

Comment 3 Petri T. Koistinen 2003-06-02 18:38:21 UTC
I hope bug #68274 is no longer an issue. If it is, I think it should be fixed too.

Comment 4 Christian Kippe 2003-06-03 06:03:41 UTC
*** Bug 91159 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***