Bug 1731683 - Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
Summary: Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Igor Gnatenko
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1731684 1731685 1731690 1731691 1731692 1731696 1731698 1731700 1731702 1731703 1731708 1731716 1731718 1731719 1731721 1731723 1731725 1731729 1731686 1731687 1731688 1731689 1731693 1731694 1731695 1731697 1731699 1731701 1731704 1731705 1731706 1731707 1731709 1731710 1731711 1731712 1731713 1731714 1731715 1731717 1731720 1731722 1731724 1731726 1731727 1731728
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-21 10:55 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2019-07-22 17:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-22 17:02:52 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-21 10:55:08 UTC
I think it would be useful to have tracker of packages which are not following Fedora Packaging Guidelines.

Comment 1 Frank Ch. Eigler 2019-07-22 17:02:52 UTC
The systemtap testsuite subrpm is special in that it deliberately wants to request both 32- and 64-bit system libraries for testing.  Using the /usr/lib/libc.so seemed like the simplest way to accomplish part of this.  Since the -testsuite subrpm is of little to no interest to most users, I would not expect the filelists.xml download to hit hard.

Comment 2 Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-22 17:04:04 UTC
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #1)
> The systemtap testsuite subrpm is special in that it deliberately wants to
> request both 32- and 64-bit system libraries for testing.  Using the
> /usr/lib/libc.so seemed like the simplest way to accomplish part of this. 
> Since the -testsuite subrpm is of little to no interest to most users, I
> would not expect the filelists.xml download to hit hard.

You need to close your component's bug, not this one.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.