Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729590 [sebastian@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm typepad-motion.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm typepad-motion.noarch: I: checking typepad-motion.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Does this need to be fixed? I'm asking since it's written in Python... This package also requires python-oauth and django-flash, which have both been submitted for review.
Just noticed I was missing a few more dependencies; packaging them now, watch out for updates.
Here's a new build which should now require all the dependencies. Out of those, all have been packaged and submitted for review, except django-typepad, on which I'm working, too. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
Adding the last requirement, django-typepad, as it has been submitted for review, too.
And another build, which adds sqlite as a dependency. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm
are dependencies built already?
Yup, I think I built all of them. Should I push them as updates first or wait for this review and push them then altogether?
Actually, I just noticed I was missing two packages. Going to build them now.
Everything's built now! :)
thanks
Review: + package builds in mock (F-13 i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1758806 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. typepad-motion.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) 8330b71b93503f90699c0c4f39519e94456c6534 typepad-motion-1.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: typepad-motion Short Description: A microblogging application for building online communities Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5
cvs done.
This is all built now, too! Closing.