Bug 6772 - Multiple Adaptec SCSI cards get loaded in the wrong order
Summary: Multiple Adaptec SCSI cards get loaded in the wrong order
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer
Version: 6.1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matt Wilson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 8038 8044 8324 10097 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-11-06 05:46 UTC by kevinmills
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2000-02-22 15:08:02 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description kevinmills 1999-11-06 05:46:01 UTC
During the install, my Adaptec 2940UW was detected and my
hard drive was found as /dev/sda.  My CDROM and Jaz drive
are on an Adaptec 1542 and, after choosing that driver, the
Jaz was detected as /dev/sdb.  Installation proceeded
normally.  However, upon re-boot the Adaptec 1542 driver
was loaded first causing my Jaz to be /dev/sda.  The
aic7xxx driver loaded next and made my hard
drive /dev/sdb.  This caused a kernel panic - no root fs.

My /etc/conf.modules file *does* list them in the correct
order; the aic7xxx driver is first and labled
scsi_hostadapter and the 1542 driver is second and labled
scsi_hostadapter1.  However, they do not load in this order.

Comment 1 Jay Turner 1999-11-09 15:54:59 UTC
I am forwarding this to a developer for further action, but in the
mean time, you can try the following and see if it helps you out.

In conf.modules, on the aic7xxx line, add "aic7xxx reverse_scan"
which should force recognition in the reverse order.

Comment 2 kevinmills 1999-11-18 22:40:59 UTC
More info:

adding the reverse_scan line did *not* change the behavior.

Comment 3 Anonymous 1999-12-01 19:01:59 UTC
I had the same problem with two SCSI adapters. I fixed it by changing
scsi_hostadapter to scsi_hostadapter0 for the adapter that the hard drive is on
(and leaving scsi_hostadapter1 for the adapter that my SCSI zip drive is on.  It
appears that the one for the second card is ignored unless you have a zero for
the first card

Comment 4 Jay Turner 2000-02-10 02:37:59 UTC
*** Bug 8324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Jay Turner 2000-02-10 02:45:59 UTC
*** Bug 8044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jay Turner 2000-02-10 03:13:59 UTC
*** Bug 8038 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 kevinmills 2000-02-10 17:17:59 UTC
I tried adding a '0' to scsi_hostadapter and saw no difference.  It behaved
exactly the same no matter which card was scsi_hostadapter0 or 1.

Comment 8 Jay Turner 2000-02-22 15:07:59 UTC
This issue is resolved in the latest cut of the installer (available in beta)

Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2000-03-09 19:48:59 UTC
*** Bug 10097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.