Bug 107393
| Summary: | Specspo update needed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Göran Uddeborg <goeran> |
| Component: | specspo | Assignee: | Bernd Groh <bgroh> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ebaak, gt, mattdm, matt, menthos, mitr, petrosyan, redhat-bugzilla |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n, StringChange |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 9.0 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-08-15 10:24:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 123268, 136451 | ||
|
Description
Göran Uddeborg
2003-10-17 18:44:45 UTC
*** Bug 109742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 121088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 79391 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 79478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 79618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 102055 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 127191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Bernd, Miloslav - why isn't the specspo package updated?! You're marking couples of bugs as duplicate, but nothing happens. Where does it hang exactly? Are translators needed? I would like to get an exact status about it. Thank you... Hi Robert, the problem was that the entire specspo process, as it was, was broken. We are currently setting up a new process. The specspo strings, as is, should now contain entries for the specs of all current packages. This update, however, came to late to have an effect on the specspo package itself, and it was a one-off thing. We are currently trying to figure out how to make the updates more incremental, and how to ensure the specspo package will always contain the newest strings and translations. FC3, unfortunately, will have to live without an update. Our apologies for not getting to this sooner. Cheers, Bernd Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test release, reopen and change the version to match. Could somebody please reasign the problem to Fedora Core devel? This problem exists further on...I'm not allowed to change these options. -> fc devel as per comment #11 There was an update of specspo around the time FC3 was released. According to comment 9 this may have been a one-off thing while waiting for a permanent solution. It seems we are still waiting for the permanent solution. While doing that, it would be nice if the updates done after FC3 could be included in FC4. The test releases so far have still had the old RH9 spcespo. Even if it is not possible to have a real FC4 version for the release of FC4, it would be better to have an FC3 version than an RH9 version. It is at least closer. Would it be possible to include the most recent specspo data in FC4? Even if it isn't completely up-to-date? ping pong Specspo (split into two modules, summary and desc) is updated daily now, and the existing translations have been merged just last week, which means we can include the current translations into the package now. Thanks. I am closing this bug report then Wouldn't "CURRENTRELEASE" mean FC4? It wasn't fixed in FC4. Accoring to comment 15 it seems there are chances it will work in FC5. Oh, well, as long as it is fixed ... |