Bug 98252

Summary: No such file or directory: '//etc/sysconfig/network-scripts//ifcfg-lo.rpmsave'
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Barry K. Nathan <barryn>
Component: system-config-networkAssignee: Harald Hoyer <harald>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2CC: barryn, e.d.grootjans, klee, nospam1, ptsekov, sindrepb, sornen, techs_21
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-07-20 09:24:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 125274    

Description Barry K. Nathan 2003-06-29 06:07:23 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619

Description of problem:
Whenever I attempt to save my configuration, I get an error message dialog box.

The title of the dialog box is "Warning", and it has a picture of an exclamation
point in a yellow triangle.

The text inside this dialog box is:
---begin quote---
redhat-config-network:

Error saving Configuration!
[Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'//etc/sysconfig/network-scripts//ifcfg-lo.rpmsave'
---end quote---

The configuration seems to get saved anyway.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-config-network-1.3.1-1
initscripts-7.25-1
rpm-4.2.1-0.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Make some kind of configuration change, or trick r-c-n into thinking you made
a change even when you didn't. (For example, double-click a PPP connection in
the Devices tab, then click OK.)

2. Choose Save from the File menu.

3. Quit r-c-n.

4. Start r-c-n up again and, if you made configuration changes, verify that they
took effect.

Actual Results:  Error message is displayed, but configuration is saved
nonetheless (as far as I can tell).

Expected Results:  Configuration saved without this error message.

Additional info:

[barryn@i5000e barryn]$ ls -l /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo.rpmsave
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           22 Jun 21 19:43
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo.rpmsave -> ../networking/ifcfg-lo
[barryn@i5000e barryn]$ ls -l /etc/sysconfig/networking/ifcfg-lo
ls: /etc/sysconfig/networking/ifcfg-lo: No such file or directory
[barryn@i5000e barryn]$ ls -l /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*
-rw-r--r--    3 root     root           74 Jun 28 22:49
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          254 Jun 20  2001
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           22 Jun 21 19:43
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo.rpmsave -> ../networking/ifcfg-lo
-rw-r--r--    3 root     root          396 Jun 28 22:49
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-UCI_lifeline
[barryn@i5000e barryn]$ rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
initscripts-7.25-1

Hmmm... My best guess is that rpm left us with a dangling symlink when it
upgraded initscripts, and now redhat-network-config is choking. Perhaps r-c-n
isn't the guilty party, but it's the one displaying the message so for now
that's the component I'm reporting this bug against.

Comment 1 Harald Hoyer 2003-07-30 13:09:31 UTC
also with the latest rawhide version?

Comment 2 Harald Hoyer 2003-10-30 14:27:07 UTC
*** Bug 105780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Harald Hoyer 2003-10-30 14:27:26 UTC
*** Bug 108409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Barry K. Nathan 2004-03-07 03:05:58 UTC
(Sorry I took so long to respond)

Bug still happens with the Fedora Core 1 release. I'll need to retest
with FC-devel when I get a chance.

Comment 5 Harald Hoyer 2004-05-24 10:38:16 UTC
*** Bug 110031 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Harald Hoyer 2004-05-24 10:38:26 UTC
*** Bug 112368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Harald Hoyer 2004-05-24 10:38:42 UTC
*** Bug 123716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Harald Hoyer 2004-05-24 10:38:47 UTC
*** Bug 123864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Keunwoo Lee 2004-07-19 19:35:42 UTC
*** Bug 128182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Harald Hoyer 2004-07-20 09:24:25 UTC
last duplication isn't a dup