Bug 1264181 - [RFE] [HA] Integrate Instance HA feature with director for automatic deployment and updates.
[RFE] [HA] Integrate Instance HA feature with director for automatic deployme...
Status: ON_DEV
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhosp-director (Show other bugs)
7.0 (Kilo)
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity medium
: Upstream M1
: 13.0 (Queens)
Assigned To: Michele Baldessari
Udi Shkalim
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trip...
upstream_milestone_pike-2 upstream_de...
: FutureFeature, InstallerIntegration, Triaged
: 1185030 1251948 1304020 1411649 1465542 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1242422 1379741
Blocks: 1182956 1419948 1422243 1442136 1458798 1465537 1484174 1487994 1488696 1488697 1185030 1251948 1261487
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-09-17 14:21 EDT by Stephen Gordon
Modified: 2017-12-06 12:37 EST (History)
32 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Feature Request
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 2661641 None None None 2016-12-14 00:18 EST
OpenStack gerrit 506350 None None None 2017-12-06 12:37 EST
OpenStack gerrit 506922 None None None 2017-12-06 12:37 EST

  None (edit)
Description Stephen Gordon 2015-09-17 14:21:28 EDT
Description of problem:

Currently the instance HA feature is configured manually using a complex series of commands but will be blow away by future OSP-d updates:

    https://access.redhat.com/node/1544823/

We need to re-work the instructions to provide an environment file suitable for inclusion in the Kbase if not shipped directly with Director. This would be a first step to integrating the instance HA feature.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHEL OpenStack Platform 7
Comment 1 Stephen Gordon 2015-11-12 14:14:13 EST
Hi Keith,

This has remained untriaged for a while - was originally targeting 7.0 y2 (this was all the reason for the clawed back scope of just providing a yaml file) - and at this point it remains unclear who is doing the work. We have a documented list of the steps required to enable this post-deploy, we need to be able to do it as part of deployment by default (and optionally disabled).

Thanks,

Steve
Comment 5 Andrew Beekhof 2016-01-05 16:34:38 EST
Chris, why are you assigning this to me?
I have no knowledge of how to modify director
Comment 6 Jaromir Coufal 2016-01-07 05:07:01 EST
Rob/Andrew, who is working on this feature from HA team? Can we assign the person who is responsible? Thanks, Jarda
Comment 7 Mike Burns 2016-04-07 16:50:54 EDT
This bug did not make the OSP 8.0 release.  It is being deferred to OSP 10.
Comment 9 Rob Young 2016-05-17 08:38:27 EDT
(In reply to Mike Burns from comment #7)
> This bug did not make the OSP 8.0 release.  It is being deferred to OSP 10.

Instance HA remains a fully supported, manually deployed and updated feature in OSP 8 and OSP 9. The scope of this request has been extended such that Instance HA will be integrated with director so that it is automatically deployed and updated on the new, single HA architecture that will be implemented in OSP 10. This has been discussed and scoped with the Pidone Eng team and factored into the PM plan for OSP 10 delivery.
Comment 12 Rob Young 2016-10-06 13:42:44 EDT
@eglynn Ack on the need for InstallerIntegration keyword on this RFE. Thanks for setting this.
Comment 15 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2016-11-16 07:52:19 EST
*** Bug 1185030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2016-11-16 07:58:08 EST
*** Bug 1304020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2016-11-16 08:00:20 EST
*** Bug 1251948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2017-01-11 23:29:54 EST
Moving to OSP12. Not enough time left for OSP11 and dependencies have not all landed in OSP11 yet.
Comment 24 Stephen Gordon 2017-01-18 14:57:56 EST
*** Bug 1411649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Rob Young 2017-03-14 16:37:09 EDT
Removing need-info flag on this. This is now moved to OSP 12.
Comment 33 Chris Jones 2017-10-25 11:18:16 EDT
*** Bug 1465542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.