Bug 68165 - mozilla segfaults when going to Flash-enabled web page
Summary: mozilla segfaults when going to Flash-enabled web page
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: gcc
Version: limbo
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 67899 68006 68230 68691 68923 69222 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 67217
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-07-07 10:41 UTC by Oleg Drokin
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-19 09:34:15 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Oleg Drokin 2002-07-07 10:41:41 UTC 
Mozilla 1.0.1 segfaults when going to flash enabled web page, instead of asking
for permission to install flash plugin like mozilla from RH 7.3 installation did.

For example this can be seen by visiting http://www.mtv.ru or
http://www.afisha.ru sites
for instant crash.
Comment 1 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-07 17:30:10 UTC 
Yay, binary incompatibility!
Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2002-07-07 18:20:34 UTC 
Chris, and what do you expect me to do with it?
gcc 3.1 simply is not binary compatible with 2.9x for C++.
Comment 3 Nathan G. Grennan 2002-07-07 20:33:29 UTC 
hehe, which is why I recompiled mozilla and galeon asap with gcc 2.96(even
discovered a but in g++296 in the process) :)
Comment 4 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-07 22:19:50 UTC 
I'm just being whiny. :)
Comment 5 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-08 12:41:29 UTC 
*** Bug 67899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-08 12:42:24 UTC 
*** Bug 68006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-08 12:43:34 UTC 
*** Bug 68230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-12 21:47:11 UTC 
*** Bug 68691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-16 15:30:34 UTC 
*** Bug 68923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Christopher Blizzard 2002-07-19 16:07:18 UTC 
*** Bug 69222 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Warren Togami 2002-08-19 09:34:10 UTC 
Is this still a bug?
Comment 12 Christopher Blizzard 2002-08-20 03:36:17 UTC 
No, this should be fixed.  I compile with gcc 2.96 now.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.