Bug 186007 (NoEverything)
Summary: | "minimal" and "everything" install modes in FC5 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Razvan Sandu <rsandu> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | amk, blin, bruno, bugproxy, frank, ipilcher, jos, mike.hoffman, snowhare, wolinski |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-92235.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-19 22:28:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Razvan Sandu
2006-03-20 22:42:39 UTC
The minimal install option has been removed because we really need to make a concerted effort to provide an actual minimal install, ideally requiring just the first CD. You can fake it by unselecting everything or doing a kickstart installation with just @Base in the package section. The everything button is gone, and will not be coming back. It has become increasingly difficult to maintain an everything install option, and will be even more difficult in the future if multiple repositories are to be available at install time. See the extremely long discussions on fedora-devel-list, fedora-test-list, and bug 183871 for more information. *** Bug 186062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 186802 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hello, However, *I consider this to be a bug*, because the "minimal" and "everything" buttons were *shortcuts* for doing installs. IMHO, the "everything" install has nothing to do with Anaconda's ability of using extern repositories. Please think of it as "everything install = all RPM packages that are actually included on the CDs" (it's a well-delimited/defined collection of packages, i.e. "the kit" on the physical media). Regards, Razvan *** Bug 191169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 193243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 199297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** A suggestion -- Rather than bringing "Minimal" and "Everything" back as installation types, would it be possible to add a couple of buttons -- "Select Everything" and "Unselect Everything" -- to the package selection screen? It might not be a bad idea to have a "Restore Defaults" button also. These still leave things open to misinterpretation and don't really solve any of the problems with the meanings of "everything" and "minimal". Multiple selection in pirut will happen (so that you can select multiple groups at once using standard GTK multiple selection), but a button is impossible to have worded clearly enough. ----- Additional Comments From bwthomas.com 2006-07-20 10:50 EDT ------- Before we fully close this, any comments on the search function also not being present? I have no further issues on the everything install aspect. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REJECTED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From bugrobot.com 2006-08-05 03:01 EDT ------- This bug has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. Please reopen if it is still valid. Now that I have gone through mucho right clicking on my first practice FC6 install, I would like to suggest expanding the right click feature for selecting optional pages to work at the top level groupings so that I only need to do 6 right clicks to select everything that can be during the install. *** Bug 213685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 221775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 221775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |