Bug 437930 (XenPvopsDom0)
| Summary: | kernel lacks support for xen Dom0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Xen Maintainance List <xen-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 12 | CC: | bjrosen, daw-redhatbugzilla, debian, drdoom, gyurco, itamar, johnny, john, kernel-maint, ma, maria_parson, markmc, mstadtle, ondrejj |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-12-05 07:12:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 434756 | ||
|
Description
Jens Petersen
2008-03-18 08:23:34 UTC
This is i686 BTW. We are not expecting to support Xen Dom0 in Fedora 9 GA release, so this is an expected failure: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-March/msg00492.html This is Dom0, right? Not a Xen DomU guest? Fedora 9 won't contain a kernel capable of booting as Dom0. See these links for more details: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvops http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2008-March/msg00013.html It is recommended to use F-8 as a Dom0 until F-10 If this an issue with a Xen DomU guest, please re-open. *** Bug 443985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 444266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 444965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 441138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 446009 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 446308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 446515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 447274 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 451156 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 451969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 458808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** May be leaving this bug open will avoid adding more and more duplicates. When somebody is searching for similar bug in bugzilla, in most situations does not search over closed bugs. Why it's problematic to rebuild kernel-xen-2.6 package on F9? *** Bug 458808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #15) > May be leaving this bug open will avoid adding more and more duplicates. > When somebody is searching for similar bug in bugzilla, in most situations does > not search over closed bugs. Fair point; it is still a bug, even if it won't be fixed for F10 > Why it's problematic to rebuild kernel-xen-2.6 package on F9? Discussed many times on fedora-xen, e.g. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2008-July/msg00048.html Maintaining the old backport of the 2.6.18 tree is wasted effort; the future is with the pv_ops support in Linus's tree. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping clearly this is still an issue in rawhide This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |