Bug 114498 - The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8
The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: gnome-panel (Show other bugs)
1.0
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Mark McLoughlin
David Lawrence
:
: 114547 114667 114898 115746 116143 116691 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-01-28 14:32 EST by Gary Peck
Modified: 2005-10-31 17:00 EST (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-29 02:22:23 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Gary Peck 2004-01-28 14:32:20 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20040105 Firebird/0.7

Description of problem:
The /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf is not properly
encoded. This causes rpm updates to emit the following warning:

/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: parser error : Input
is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding !
      Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6
                               ^
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: error: Bytes: 0xF3
0x6E 0x20 0x4C
      Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6
                               ^
OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML:
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf
Unable to complete update.  Could not register
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-panel-2.5.3.1-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install gnome-panel
2. run scrollkeeper-update
3.
    

Actual Results:  The same output as in the description.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Gary Peck 2004-02-05 23:56:39 EST
Looks like it's fixed upstream according to
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-February/msg00259.html.
Comment 2 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 13:29:05 EST
*** Bug 114547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 13:30:03 EST
*** Bug 114898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 12:34:23 EST
*** Bug 116143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 12:34:53 EST
*** Bug 115746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-23 05:12:33 EST
According to bug 116475 this issue is still open in gnome-panel-2.5.3,
in contrast to what comment 1 suggests.
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 18:16:06 EST
*** Bug 116475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Mike McLean 2004-02-23 18:18:34 EST
It's very nice that this bug is fixed upstream, but can we please
actually get that fix in rawhide?
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 18:50:36 EST
*** Bug 116631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-24 05:10:23 EST
Does the update to gnome-panel-2.4.2-1 solve this issue? If so it
needs to be propagated to 2.5.3 (upstream) (see bug 116475 for FC2 test1).
Comment 11 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-24 15:26:17 EST
*** Bug 116691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 12:57:45 EST
*** Bug 114667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 17:53:43 EST
Should be fixed in Raw Hide now
Comment 14 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-28 13:45:07 EST
Err...  You call that a fix?  It was a very ugly work around!  What's
wrong with the correct fix proposed in bug 116691?  Perhaps the fact
that `aplicación', which I wrote in the bugzilla bug entry form,
didn't make it to the actual bug report correctly?
Comment 15 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 02:22:23 EST
This was fixed upstream. All I did was pull the latest upstream
tarball. If you think the upstream fix was wrong please reopen:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132715
Comment 16 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-29 16:36:32 EST
Oh, my, sorry about my tone above.  It was meant to be read in a
joking tone, but only now I realize I missed :-)s all over.  If you
got me all wrong, please accept my deepest apologies.  I added a note
to the upstream bug, but I don't have permission to reopen it.  I hope
it doesn't get lost.
Comment 17 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 16:42:51 EST
Heh - don't worry, I've learned well enough at this stage not to take
stuff personally :-)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.