Bug 657619 (F15Beta-accepted, F15BetaFreezeExcept)

Summary: Fedora 15 Beta nice-to-have tracker
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Adam Williamson <awilliam>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: dcantrell, lmacken, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Tracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-13 20:39:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 604334, 629311, 672135, 672282, 672527, 673824, 675509, 677609, 679814, 679825, 681045, 681580, 682543, 683548, 684214, 687866, 688305, 689260, 689291, 691139, 691461, 691995, 692048, 692135, 693899    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Adam Williamson 2010-11-26 20:23:07 UTC 
Fedora 15 Beta nice-to-have bug tracker, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers
Comment 1 Ales Kozumplik 2011-03-09 12:08:27 UTC 
Why is this bug called 'accepted' when we use it to propose NTH bugs, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process?
Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2011-03-09 16:44:40 UTC 
we had a mailing list debate and came up with that term, iirc. I tend to refer to 'nth' much more now, though.
Comment 3 Luke Macken 2011-04-12 01:56:02 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is this bug called 'accepted' when we use it to propose NTH bugs, according
> to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process?

I found this to be confusing as well.