Bug 606686 - [abrt] crash in pino-0.2.10-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/pino was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in pino-0.2.10-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/pino was killed b...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 603854
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pino
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Filipe Rosset
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:b4b8098d2166198822af8087d0d...
Keywords:
: 587355 603272 604009 604208 604510 604511 605503 605589 606221 606657 607070 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-22 08:55 UTC by Gabriel PREDA
Modified: 2010-07-11 14:41 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2010-07-11 14:41:45 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (23.91 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-22 08:55 UTC, Gabriel PREDA
no flags Details

Description Gabriel PREDA 2010-06-22 08:55:32 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: pino
component: pino
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/pino
global_uuid: b4b8098d2166198822af8087d0dbe9c60649ea3e
kernel: 2.6.32.14-127.fc12.x86_64
package: pino-0.2.10-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/pino was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
How to reproduce: Just open Pino...

comment
-----
After this behaviour was usual I removed pino (with yum) then looked for every file generated by pino (updatedb, locate... rm -Rf )... to simulate a fresh install...

Even with this effort pino crashed... on my work computer.

On my home computer with F13 it works ok.

Comment 1 Gabriel PREDA 2010-06-22 08:55:34 UTC
Created attachment 425861 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:22:21 UTC
*** Bug 606657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:22:49 UTC
*** Bug 606221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:24:16 UTC
*** Bug 605503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:26:54 UTC
*** Bug 604208 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:27:03 UTC
*** Bug 605589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:27:44 UTC
*** Bug 603272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:29:07 UTC
*** Bug 604009 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:30:25 UTC
*** Bug 604510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:33:14 UTC
*** Bug 604511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Chen Lei 2010-06-22 11:34:32 UTC
*** Bug 587355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Chen Lei 2010-06-23 06:20:49 UTC
*** Bug 607070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Gianluca Sforna 2010-06-29 14:57:12 UTC
Looks like bug 603854 is also a duplicate of this one.

Please have a look at the patch in upstream tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/pino-twitter/issues/attachmentText?id=259&aid=-8820533392689778435&name=0.2.10-gthread.patch

Comment 14 dekellum 2010-07-01 18:10:48 UTC
I have the same problem. Temp workaround to get pino working again for me was to uninstall from yum and replace pino with this build:

http://code.google.com/p/pino-twitter/downloads/detail?name=pino-0.2.8-1.fc12.al.i686.rpm

Comment 15 Gabriel PREDA 2010-07-07 07:22:10 UTC
I also confirm no crash so far on Fedora 12 with pino 0.2.9 from sources from http://code.google.com/p/pino-twitter/downloads/detail?name=pino-0.2.9.tar.bz2&can=2&q=label%3DSource&sort=-filename

Comment 16 Chen Lei 2010-07-11 14:41:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 603854 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.