Bug 72177

Summary: lpr initscript fails with python backtrace
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Daniel Resare <noa-bugzilla-redhat>
Component: redhat-config-printerAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: null   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-21 18:13:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Daniel Resare 2002-08-21 18:13:27 UTC
Description of Problem:
On my freshly installed null system the lpr init-script fails with the following
message:

Starting lpd: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/printconf-backend", line 7, in ?
    import printconf_backend
  File "/usr/share/printconf/util/printconf_backend.py", line 30, in ?
    _=gettext.gettext
NameError: name 'gettext' is not defined

Perhaps a missing 'import gettext' in
/usr/share/printconf/util/printconf_backend.py?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
LPRng-3.8.9-6

How Reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run /sbin/service lpd start


Additional Information:

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2002-08-21 22:06:58 UTC
This is already fixed in redhat-config-printer-0.4.22-1.

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2002-08-22 06:49:28 UTC
*** Bug 72219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 09:24:51 UTC
*** Bug 72548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 23:08:22 UTC
*** Bug 72588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 23:08:55 UTC
*** Bug 72600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Tim Waugh 2002-08-27 18:16:32 UTC
*** Bug 72773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2002-09-01 19:58:36 UTC
*** Bug 73241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Tim Waugh 2002-09-02 17:53:07 UTC
*** Bug 73299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Tim Waugh 2002-09-03 07:03:13 UTC
*** Bug 72507 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Tim Waugh 2002-09-04 21:02:15 UTC
*** Bug 73440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Tim Waugh 2002-09-06 16:51:06 UTC
*** Bug 73606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Tim Waugh 2002-09-08 20:49:36 UTC
*** Bug 73683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Tim Waugh 2002-09-11 06:43:47 UTC
*** Bug 73792 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 15:58:27 UTC
*** Bug 74300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 16:19:07 UTC
*** Bug 74300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 16 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 17:14:04 UTC
*** Bug 72545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 22:04:39 UTC
*** Bug 74333 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***