Bug 72177 - lpr initscript fails with python backtrace
Summary: lpr initscript fails with python backtrace
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-config-printer
Version: null
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 72219 72507 72545 72548 72588 72600 72773 73241 73299 73440 73606 73683 73792 74300 74333 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-08-21 18:13 UTC by Daniel Resare
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:45 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-21 18:13:36 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Daniel Resare 2002-08-21 18:13:27 UTC 
Description of Problem:
On my freshly installed null system the lpr init-script fails with the following
message:

Starting lpd: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/printconf-backend", line 7, in ?
    import printconf_backend
  File "/usr/share/printconf/util/printconf_backend.py", line 30, in ?
    _=gettext.gettext
NameError: name 'gettext' is not defined

Perhaps a missing 'import gettext' in
/usr/share/printconf/util/printconf_backend.py?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
LPRng-3.8.9-6

How Reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run /sbin/service lpd start


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2002-08-21 22:06:58 UTC 
This is already fixed in redhat-config-printer-0.4.22-1.
Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2002-08-22 06:49:28 UTC 
*** Bug 72219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 09:24:51 UTC 
*** Bug 72548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 23:08:22 UTC 
*** Bug 72588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2002-08-25 23:08:55 UTC 
*** Bug 72600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Tim Waugh 2002-08-27 18:16:32 UTC 
*** Bug 72773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2002-09-01 19:58:36 UTC 
*** Bug 73241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Tim Waugh 2002-09-02 17:53:07 UTC 
*** Bug 73299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Tim Waugh 2002-09-03 07:03:13 UTC 
*** Bug 72507 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Tim Waugh 2002-09-04 21:02:15 UTC 
*** Bug 73440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Tim Waugh 2002-09-06 16:51:06 UTC 
*** Bug 73606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Tim Waugh 2002-09-08 20:49:36 UTC 
*** Bug 73683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Tim Waugh 2002-09-11 06:43:47 UTC 
*** Bug 73792 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 15:58:27 UTC 
*** Bug 74300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 16:19:07 UTC 
*** Bug 74300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 17:14:04 UTC 
*** Bug 72545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Tim Waugh 2002-09-20 22:04:39 UTC 
*** Bug 74333 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.